Staff already pasting client data into consumer chat tools
The behavior is happening whether or not there is a policy. Governance names an approved tool, blocks the rest, and explains why in a paragraph rather than a memo.
Governance here means writing down what people may and may not put into these tools, where the data goes, and who is accountable when an answer is wrong. It is a short document that staff read, not a framework with five maturity stages and a curve.
The work is mostly about specifics. A policy that says to use AI responsibly changes nobody's behavior. A policy that says which client documents may be pasted into which tool, and names the approved alternative for the rest, does.
This is not a certification and we do not sell it as one. Gray Sand holds no ISO 42001 audit and offers no legal opinion. What you get is the policy, the data handling rules, the review process, and the technical guardrails that back them up.
The behavior is happening whether or not there is a policy. Governance names an approved tool, blocks the rest, and explains why in a paragraph rather than a memo.
A procurement questionnaire arrives with eleven questions about AI use. Having real answers written down is the difference between winning the contract and stalling.
Tools get adopted by whoever found them. A short approval path with a named owner stops the sprawl without stopping the useful ones.

A site for a regulated cardiac monitoring company. Every product claim is checked against the rules at save time, and nothing publishes without regulatory sign-off, so marketing can move without putting a clearance at risk.
In build. Not public yet.

Discovery calls are free and usually last 30 minutes. We listen first, and we will tell you honestly if ai governance is the wrong thing to spend money on.